Growth this year in the transport of international goods has bypassed traditional scheduled containerised ocean freight services, as shippers found alternative means of getting their goods to market, new report highlights
Ocean freight capacity restoration ‘is key to crisis recovery’
Much of the growth this year in the transport of international goods has bypassed traditional scheduled containerised ocean freight services and been moved by other means, according to the findings of the latest Container Shipping Market Quarterly Review, published by the Global Shippers Forum (GSF) and MDS Transmodal.
The report indicates that the global trade in goods has continued to grow this year, including in the third quarter (Q3) of 2021, but with deployed container shipping capacity fully utilised, that additional growth is being moved by a mix of air freight, rail services between China and Europe, and own-charter vessels or services provided by non-liner carriers.
Commenting on the findings of the latest Quarterly Review, GSF director said: “The Container Shipping Market Review shows the extent to which shippers sought out alternatives, as shipping lines priced themselves out of reach and narrowed the cost difference with offerings from other modes. A measurable share is also accounted for by vessels chartered by shippers for their own goods, or by other non-liner shipping carriers.”
The chart (below) shows the growth in world trade since Q2 2020, as recorded by landed imported volumes (gold line) and the slightly declining volumes carried by scheduled ocean liner services since that time (blue line) – “the difference being international unitisable trade that is being moved other than by scheduled liner shipping service”, the report highlighted.
Source: Lloyd's Loading List
Looking to the future, GSF director continued: “The Great Shipping Crisis of 2021 has taken many casualties as shippers trapped between record rates and very poor service levels struggled to fulfil delivery deadlines for imports destined for the holiday sales season. Shippers will be watching anxiously to see how quickly these conditions abate in 2022, and whether the use of these alternative services will continue to grow.
“Shipping lines are attributing the cause of the crisis to severe congestion in ports and logistics bottlenecks inland. But this means that, as these conditions ease post-peak season and output dips in Chinese New Year, container shipping capacity levels should increase to match shippers’ demand more closely. This recovery in capacity could accelerate if consumers switch spending to services rather than goods, and interest rate hikes and higher energy costs take their toll on discretionary spending”.
New analysis in the Review reveals the extent to which shipping lines have adjusted global service patterns with many more ‘shuttle services’ being introduced at the expense of services making multiple port calls in different regions. This reduces the number of countries with direct connections to their export markets and requires more frequent transfer of loads between services at hub ports, such as Singapore and Colombo.
Chairman of MDS Transmodal, said: “Our review this quarter has examined how alliance members have expanded their role in developing consortia and therefore market shares and the way in which they have addressed operational challenges in modifying route structures. This reduction in services linking multiple world regions has been accompanied by a decline in the number of countries that are directly connected.
“Given the dramatic growth in freight rates and declining service performance it is not surprising to see trade growing more quickly than container volumes on the established lines, as shippers have found other transport solutions; starting own shipping routes, using long-haul rail or air or semi-bulk traffics switching to conventional methods.”
The report shows an increase in the number of scheduled liner services serving just two regions, and the decline in services making multiple port calls in more than two regions. The number of countries benefitting from direct connections has been in decline of since 2019, the report said.
NEOLink cooperated with our order processing system. He did not replace it or force solutions. Logfret did it better than other companies on the market – it adapted its system to ours. Logfret didn’t come to us saying, “We have this solution, and you either use it or we won’t cooperate.
We made a huge improvement in global visibility with a global platform—anyone can log into NEOLink and look at a shipment anytime, anywhere in the world. We wanted a freight forwarder with a good technology platform, which could handle the complexities of our business and we found NEOLink!
My suppliers have less or zero experience with international logistics. Thus, not able to create proper documentation which leads to tremendous delay. Thanks to Logfret who provide training to all suppliers and work with us to build up a consolidation hub to reduce transportation costs significantly.