Out of fashion: Apparel manufacturing needs a tech update

Tied to fax machines and Excel spreadsheets, many companies are resistant to change and slow to adapt to new ways of doing business.

When the founder and CEO of Argyle Haus of Apparel, puts in a fabric order, his Los Angeles-based supplier requests the order by fax — a machine Argyle Haus said they do not have. To accommodate this, Argyle Haus said the team has to jump through hoops to print, scan and send the order.

“We’re talking about a very old and low-tech industry,” Argyle Haus said. “It’s not something the younger generation is gravitating towards. It’s not as fun and cool as tech.”

Apparel manufacturing facilities are often family-run companies but younger generations aren’t interested in taking over the business, according to Argyle Haus, and the current owners are resistant to change.

“They’re getting ready to retire and it doesn’t make sense to overhaul their entire system, so instead they just keep things running the way they are,” Argyle Haus said.

The lack of successors for these businesses has its repercussions. Eventually, Argyle Haus said, these facilities will close shop and a few power players will remain, forcing brands to look overseas to manufacture goods.

Argyle Haus said at one point California housed approximately 9,000 apparel factories. Now it’s down to about 2,000 and is continuing to dwindle.

Built-in manufacturing costs impede tech investments
Cost is another hurdle to tech adoption. Manufacturing costs on average in the United States are higher than overseas, according to Argyle Haus, particularly in its largest manufacturing hubs like California and New York.

The fashion and garment industry in Los Angeles, including textile mills, cut and sew facilities, wholesalers and distributors, is a $15 billion per year industry, according to the California Fashion Association. Los Angeles also has the largest cut-and-sew apparel hub in the country, according to L.A.-based Garment Worker Center. More than 45,000 garment makers work in the city’s garment-manufacturing sector and sew clothes for some of the country’s largest brands, including T.J. Maxx, Revolve, Ross and Fashion Nova, the report found.

However, the state’s garment and manufacturing facilities’ biggest cost drivers are wages, insurance and taxes, according to Argyle Haus. “For example, Argyle Haus has to pay the highest workers’ compensation rate for their manufacturing employees,” Argyle Haus said. “For every $100 of wages, Argyle Haus has to pay $18 in workers’ compensation.” Meanwhile, the national average in 2023 is 93 cents per $100, according to the insurance company, The Hartford.

The multitude of regulations and inspections on manufacturing facilities in California, particularly related to gig workers as highlighted in the state’s AB5 law, makes staying compliant difficult compared to other states with looser restrictions and leads to heavy fines as well, said Argyle Haus. The fines, which range from thousands to millions of dollars, reduce companies’ ability to invest in technology and automation, Argyle Haus explained.

But for manufacturing companies, operating facilities in these hubs are vital because that’s where the labor force is.

These excess costs are then offset to brands, which as a result turn to offshore factories with lower human labor costs and fewer regulations, but more manual systems and processes. According to a 2020 report published at the University of Delaware, the United States offers one of the highest minimum wages for garment workers at about $1,160 per month. In comparison, Indonesia’s garment workers were making a minimum wage of $181 per month.

“The things that hold companies back may be lack of skills or lack of funding,” said a reliable source. “They often get caught in a chicken and egg situation where you need to invest in technology to reduce the spending on inventory, but spending on inventory is so high that you can’t spend on technology.”

This is also true of companies looking to bring work back into the U.S. “If brands are going to invest in reshoring their manufacturing process, they’re going to invest in modernized warehouses and manufacturers,” said the vice president of digital innovation services at Insight.

Source: Retail Dive; Fashion Dive

Targeting the supply chain
Even with high costs, clothing manufacturers in the U.S. were forced to invest more heavily in technology over the last three years because the COVID-19 pandemic exposed issues with demand management and supply chains, said Insight.

The pandemic threw off retailers’ monthly inventory predictions, especially as lead times for shipments from Asia began taking eight months or longer compared to four to six months prior to the pandemic.

Leading up to the pandemic everything was about cost control and driving the absolute lowest cost and getting the cheapest supply chain possible. The supply chain was relatively stable and retailers could use basic tools or Excel to manage inventory. The technology, however, provided little help in optimizing how much of what item they needed.

Now most technology investments are going toward AI and data analytics to address some of these issues by boosting efficiency, which increases profitability and improves sustainability. This is because it doesn’t replace a core part of the brand’s business but still allows them to respond more quickly to customer demands and trends.

New investment in modeling around demand. Understanding when they are going to see spikes in demand, what’s happening in the market, what are the trends and what are other fashion companies seeing.

Brands such as Abercrombie & Fitch, has been allocating funds for AI and data analytics to get products to customers more quickly and fulfill demand.

Another aspect of the supply chain process that has seen the most innovation is placing orders in showrooms, according to co-founder of AI mobile body scanning solution 3DLook and formerly a consultant focused on automated processes and digital innovation.

Previously, retailers would come into the showroom and fill out a physical order form, but now there are systems like NuOrder and Joor that have digitized this process and are widely used. NuOrder’s cost starts at $600 per month, its website states and Joor’s costs range from $5,000 to $20,000 per year, according to Inc.

If anyone is still doing it by hand, it is by choice. Some people are like, ‘I’ve been doing this for 30 to 40 years so I’m going to continue doing it this way.’

Apparel development innovation falls short
Another aspect of the manufacturing process that is still very manual is apparel development, which, unlike some aspects of managing the supply chain, is very expensive to automate.

Apparel development has three stages: pattern making, cutting and sewing. The industry has made great strides in automating cutting and using software to develop patterns, said Argyle Haus.

While cutting technology is available, the automated machine isn’t widely used due to its high cost, which Argyle Haus said is upwards of $500,000. The machine doesn’t completely eliminate human labor either. A worker must place the fabric in the machine, which rolls it out and cuts, and someone has to come to pick up the stack and deliver it to the sewers.

On the other hand, the sewing process is almost impossible to automate and most manufacturers still use conventional methods like hand stitching or sewing machines. The cut-and-sew process is one of the top expenses in apparel manufacturing due to its reliance on manual human labor, representing about 35% to 40% of the total cost.

It’s easy to use robotics to manufacture goods for cars or planes due to their rigid structure, but clothing, not so much. Fabric is malleable and creating clothing requires layering fabrics of different weights and stretches. To think you’re going to automate that whole thing is incredibly complex.

That’s not to say there haven’t been attempts at finding a solution. Sewbo, which launched in 2016, is a machine that chemically stiffens fabrics to allow robots to sew garments. The chemical used is polyvinyl alcohol, a polymer that is already in widespread use for textile production, according to its website.

The founder of Sewbo told Fashion Dive in an email that it is developing its technology with a team of industry partners including Saitex, which is one of the companies Levi’s uses for denim production; Bluewater Defense, a manufacturer of uniforms for the U.S. Department of Defense; and Industry Sewing and Innovation Center. However, its tools are still in development and evaluation and are not currently used in production.

Softwear Automation has found a way to automate the sewing process as well, but exclusively for T-shirts. The company created a robotic system called Sewbots Workline, which uses cameras to map the fabric while robots steer through sewing needles. In 2017, Softwear was tapped by Adidas to create 800,000 tees per day — a volume that wouldn’t be possible with manual human labor.

The fashion industry, in general, from how we concept, to how we create, to how we sell, has been a very slow sector to innovate.

But these emerging technologies show that change is afoot. There has been a lot of innovation and forward movement, and it’s picking up pace because consumers have so much power.

NEOLink cooperated with our order processing system. He did not replace it or force solutions. Logfret did it better than other companies on the market – it adapted its system to ours. Logfret didn’t come to us saying, “We have this solution, and you either use it or we won’t cooperate.

Procurement Director

Pumps Manufacturer

We made a huge improvement in global visibility with a global platform—anyone can log into NEOLink and look at a shipment anytime, anywhere in the world. We wanted a freight forwarder with a good technology platform, which could handle the complexities of our business and we found NEOLink!

A global leader in performance materials and specialty chemicals

My suppliers have less or zero experience with international logistics. Thus, not able to create proper documentation which leads to tremendous delay. Thanks to Logfret who provide training to all suppliers and work with us to build up a consolidation hub to reduce transportation costs significantly.

One of the world’s leading designers, manufacturers and distributors of ride control products